Module ASB-3004:
Marketing Dissertation
Marketing Dissertation 2024-25
ASB-3004
2024-25
Bangor Business School
Module - Semester 2
40 credits
Module Organiser:
Elizabeth Heyworth-Thomas
Overview
There is no set syllabus. The subject matter can be drawn from any area of the academic marketing discipline, provided that there is suitable and sufficient literature available, and a member of staff is available to supervise in the chosen area of study. Students are expected to choose their dissertation topic in consultation with the module organiser and members of marketing staff at the start of the academic year. The dissertation should bridge across academic and practitioner domains, bringing meaning and relevance from academic literature to address practical marketing problems.
Assessment Strategy
-threshold -D- to D+ (40-49%): No major omissions or inaccuracies in the deployment of information/skills. Some grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Integration of theory/practice/information present intermittently in pursuit of the assessed work's objectives. -good -B- to B+ (60-69%): Most of the relevant information accurately deployed. Good grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Good integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work's objectives. Evidence of the use of creative and reflective skills. -excellent -A- to A (70% +):* Outstanding performance. The relevant information accurately deployed. Excellent grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practice elements. Good integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work's objectives. Strong evidence of the use of creative and reflective skills. -another level-C- to C+ (50-59%): Much of the relevant information and skills mostly accurately deployed. Adequate grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Fair integration of theory/practice/information in the pursuit of the assessed work's objectives. Some evidence of the use of creative and reflective skills.
Learning Outcomes
- Apply appropriate analytical, statistical, IT, research design, writing and other research skills in order to extract and present relevant theoretical and/or empirical evidence on the chosen topic.
- Demonstrate an ability to present complex ideas orally and in written form.
- Demonstrate good presentation and organisational skills through planning, writing, editing and compiling a substantial research report.
- Identify and synthesise relevant research to draw theoretical conclusions for the project.
- Identify relevant research to specify a data collection and analysis strategy for the project.
- Synthesise and critically appraise a body of academic literature.
Assessment method
Dissertation
Assessment type
Summative
Description
Final Presentation: A practitioner focused presentation that outlines the key findings from the project and their relevance to organisations and wider stakeholder groups.
Weighting
15%
Assessment method
Dissertation
Assessment type
Summative
Description
Final Report: A full overview of the project needs to be provided in a report format covering all aspects of the project.
Weighting
40%
Assessment method
Dissertation
Assessment type
Summative
Description
Research Proposal. A research proposal should cover the outline of the project covering relevant background, literature, and methods that could be employed to achieve the research goal. Practicalities such as potential constraints and a timeline of activity should also be documented.
Weighting
25%
Assessment method
Dissertation
Assessment type
Summative
Description
Methods and Data analysis plan: A detailed account of the research method including a data collection and analysis plan. Any research instrument that is intended for use should be provided. Ethical considerations need to be discussed and a completed ethical vetting form included in the submission.
Weighting
10%
Assessment method
Coursework
Assessment type
Summative
Description
Specifying aim and objectives of the research including relevant bibliography. Bibliography should detail a minimum of 10 pieces of research that underpin the background and focus of the project. A summary of this research should be provided as well as an account of synergies and contradictions present in the literature base. From the literature discussed a research gap should be identified and a research aim and associated research objectives stipulated.
Weighting
10%