Modiwl HPS-2005:
Work Placement - Semester 2
Work Placement - Semester 2 2024-25
HPS-2005
2024-25
School Of History, Law And Social Sciences
Module - Semester 2
20 credits
Module Organiser:
Hefin Gwilym
Overview
Sessions may include, but are not limited to: - Work placement (times/days arranged with organisation) - Employability sessions - Assignment support - Drop in
Sessions may include, but are not limited to: - Work placement (times/days arranged with organisation) - Employability sessions - Assignment support - Drop in
Assessment Strategy
-threshold -For the report - shows satisfactory ability to reflect on the work-based learning experience; provides a satisfactory commentary on the student’s own experiences of the placement. Demonstrates a basic awareness of the literature on reflective and experiential learning.For the presentation on the student’s work with the agency - satisfactory presentation on the student’s work with the agency - Satisfactory description of the work placement - Satisfactory evaluation of one aspect of the work undertaken during the placement. - Uses little or no research related to the subject. - Satisfactory delivery, but one or two improvements were needed relating to delivery e.g speech patterns, eye contact, presentation slides, more research; preparation for the questions - Satisfactory presentation slides but one or two improvements needed e.g no more than 5 bullet points & text, mixture of texture of picture, only Time or Ariel font, design is clear - Satisfactory responses in discussion, but much more understanding of the subject area was needed
-good -C- to B+For the report- shows a good or very good ability to reflect on the work-based learning experience; provides a thorough commentary on the student’s own experiences of the placement. Demonstrates good or very good awareness of the literature on reflective and experiential learning.For the presentation on the student’s work with the agency - a good or very good presentation on the student’s work with the agency - Good/very good description of the work placement - Good/very good evaluation of one aspect of the work undertaken during the placement. - Uses some research related to the subject. - Overall, a good/very good delivery, but one or two improvements were needed relating to delivery e.g speech patterns, eye contact, presentation slides, more research; preparation for the questions - Good/very good presentation slides but one or two improvements needed e.g no more than 5 bullet points & text, mixture of texture of picture, only Time or Ariel font, design is clear - Good/very good responses in discussion but more preparation needed
-excellent -A- to AFor the report – shows excellent ability to reflect on the work-based learning experience; provides an insightful and skilled commentary on the student’s own experiences of the placement. Demonstrates excellent awareness of the literature on reflective and experiential learning. For the presentation on the student’s work with the agency* – an excellent presentation that discusses the placement in an informed and perceptive way. - Excellent description of the work placement - Excellent evaluation of one aspect of the work undertaken during the placement. - Has an excellent understanding of research related to the subject. - Enthusiastic and engaged delivery that makes the audience want to listen; - Excellent presentation slides that compliment the oral presentation e.g no more than 5 bullet points & text, mixture of texture of picture, only Time or Ariel font, design is clear - Perceptive and interesting responses in discussion.
Learning Outcomes
- Develop and reflect on the acquisition of a range of work-based skills.
- Engage constructively in a learning environment.
- Establish effective working relationships with staff and client groups within the agency.
- Identify a range of professional and academic skills which are relevant to the workplace.
- Report on and evaluate one or more aspects of the student’s own work within the agency.
Assessment type
Summative
Weighting
50%
Assessment type
Summative
Weighting
50%